Cases 11 - 20 of 77
Mohammad v. United States, et al
as 14-2097
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KHALID MOHAMMAD
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF NEW MEXICO, COUNTY OF BERNALILLO and others
Stallings v. Franco, et al
as 14-2071
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICK G. STALLINGS
Respondent - Appellee:
GERMAN FRANCO, Warden and GARY K. KING, New Mexico Attorney General
Mohammad v. Rio Metro Regional Transit et al
as 1:2014cv00353
Plaintiff:
Khalid Mohammad
Defendant:
Rio Metro Regional Transit, United States of America, US Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mohammad v. Circle K #8943 et al
as 1:2014cv00340
Plaintiff:
Khalid Mohammad
Defendant:
Circle K #8943, United States of America, U.S. Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mohammad v. Alon 7-Eleven #716
as 1:2014cv00325
Plaintiff:
Khalid Mohammad
Defendant:
Alon 7-Eleven #716, United States of America, United States Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mohammad v. Alon 7-Eleven #713
as 1:2014cv00324
Plaintiff:
Khalid Mohammad
Defendant:
Alon 7-Eleven #713, United States of America, United States Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mohammad v. Alon 7-Eleven #717
as 1:2014cv00326
Plaintiff:
Khalid Mohammad
Defendant:
Alon 7-Eleven #717, United States of America, United States Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mohammad v. United States of America et al
as 1:2014cv00307
Plaintiff:
Khalid Mohammad
Defendant:
United States of America, State of New Mexico, County of Bernalillo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mohammad v. Banks et al
as 1:2014cv00170
Plaintiff:
Khalid Mohammad
Defendant:
Allan Banks, Ramon Rustin and Gary K King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinez v. Williams, et al
as 13-2172
Petitioner - Appellant:
FRANK MARTINEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
DERRICK WILLIAMS, Warden and NEW MEXICO ATTORNEY GENERAL GARY K. KING
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
