Cases 1 - 10 of 23
De LaMadrid-Hock v. Trevino et al
as 2:2016cv00209
Defendant:
Juan Trevino, III and Gary L. Currie
Plaintiff:
Ancelvo Gil De LaMadrid-Hock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Stephens et al
as 2:2015cv00211
Plaintiff:
Grady Allen Davis
Defendant:
William Stephens, Gary L Currie, Vickie Barrow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Piasecki v. Currie Do Not Docket. Case transferred to the Houston Division.
as 2:2015cv00162
Petitioner:
Terry Lee Piasecki
Respondent:
Gary L Currie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
William Krieg v. Joshua Keeney, et al
as 14-10993
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM HENRY KRIEG
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSHUA L. KEENEY, Shift Sergeant, TDCJ-CID, Montford Unit, NICKY EMSOFF, Shift Lieutenant, TDCJ-CID, Montford Unit, GRAYSON W. HOWARD, Shift Captain, TDCJ-CID, Montford Unit and others
Jonathan Watson v. William Stephens, Director, et al
as 14-40819
Petitioner - Appellant:
JONATHAN HARRIS WATSON
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION and GARY L. CURRIE, Warden, McConnell Unit
Ballew v. Currie
as 2:2014cv00311
Petitioner:
Antwynne Ballew
Defendant:
Gary L. Currie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Franco v. Collins et al
as 2:2014cv00148
Plaintiff:
Javier Rivera Franco
Defendant:
Kisha A Collins, Gary L Currie, Maria D Ramirez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kearey v. Currie et al
as 2:2014cv00039
Plaintiff:
Mark Jamal Kearey
Defendant:
Gary L Currie, Carol E Monroe, L. Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Copeland v. Ferrell et al
as 2:2013cv00395
Plaintiff:
Curtis Gene Copeland
Defendant:
Ronald Ferrell, James A. McKee, Michael Alsobrook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Minnfee v. Livingston et al
as 5:2013mc00937
Plaintiff:
Barry Dwayne Minnfee
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Gary L. Currie, Bryan C Gaines and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
