Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Eisenmann v. Thornell et al
as 2:2023cv02285
Petitioner: Gary Lane Eisenmann
Respondent: Ryan Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gary Eisenmann v. Doug Ducey, et al
as 21-16393
Plaintiff / Appellant: GARY LANE EISENMANN
Defendant / Appellee: DOUG DUCEY, Governor and STATE OF ARIZONA, Real Party in Interest/Respondent
Gary Eisenmann v. Doug Ducey, et al
as 21-16086
Plaintiff / Appellant: GARY LANE EISENMANN
Defendant / Appellee: DOUG DUCEY, Governor and STATE OF ARIZONA, Real Party in Interest/Respondent
Gary Lane et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 2:2018cv01713
Plaintiff: Gary Lane and Blake Lane
Defendant: Ford Motor Company, Joe Macpherson Ford, Joe Macpherson Ford a California corporation doing business as Power Ford Tustin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl Notice of Removal - Product Liability
Gary Eisenmann v. Joseph Arpaio
as 17-15173
Petitioner - Appellant: GARY LANE EISENMANN
Respondent - Appellee: JOSEPH M. ARPAIO
Eisenmann v. Arpaio
as 2:2016cv03330
Petitioner: Gary Lane Eisenmann
Respondent: Joseph M Arpaio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Eisenmann v. Arpaio
as 2:2016cv00563
Petitioner: Gary Lane Eisenmann
Respondent: Joseph M Arpaio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lane v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company et al
as 2:2011cv01309
Plaintiff: Gary Lane
Defendant: State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?