Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Martinson v. Mikes et al
as 5:2022cv00696
Plaintiff:
Anthony Geno Martinson
Defendant:
Gary Lee Mikes, Gary Lee Mikes, Jr. and Lysa Marie Mikes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lee v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00812
Defendant:
Davol Inc, CR Bard, Davol, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Gary Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pullen v. Mohr et al
as 1:2018cv00386
Plaintiff:
Gary Lee Pullen
Defendant:
Gary C. Mohr, Ron Erdos, Crabtree and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pullen v. Conschafsky et al
as 1:2016cv00894
Plaintiff:
Gary Lee Pullen
Defendant:
Conschafsky, Ron Erdos, Cool and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Warden Franklin Medical Center
as 2:2015cv01113
Petitioner:
Gary Lee Williams
Respondent:
Warden Franklin Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dailey v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv01105
Plaintiff:
Gary Lee Dailey
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brown v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv00842
Plaintiff:
Gary Lee Brown
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clayton et al v. Zimmer, Inc. et al
as 5:2012cv01270
Plaintiff:
Marsha Clayton and Gary Lee Clayton
Defendant:
Zimmer, Inc. , Zimmer Holdings, Inc. and Zimmer Orthopaedic Surgical Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kemp et al v. Depuy Orthopaedics Inc. et al
as 1:2011dp22366
Defendant:
Depuy Orthopaedics Inc. , DePuy Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Plaintiff:
Gary Lee Kemp and Blanche Kemp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McElwayne et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2011dp21815
Plaintiff:
Gary Lee McElwayne and Virginia McElwayne
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
