Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Rogers v. Gary Police Department The
as 2:2019cv00142
Plaintiff:
Karla Linett Rogers
Defendant:
Gary Police Department The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter-Lawson v. City of Gary Police Department et al
as 2:2018cv00309
Plaintiff:
Carmen Carter-Lawson
Defendant:
Antonio Johnson, City of Gary Police Department and Karen Freeman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marquez v. City of Gary et al
as 2:2015cv00313
Plaintiff:
Jose Marquez
Defendant:
City of Gary, City of Gary Police Department, S. Otten and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Greene v. City of Gary Community School Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv00267
Plaintiff:
Latoya Greene
Defendant:
City of Gary Community School Corporation , City of Gary , City of Gary Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Holland et al v. The City of Gary et al
as 2:2015cv00207
Plaintiff:
Robert Holland and The Law Firm of Robert Holland
Defendant:
The City of Gary , Rudy Clay , Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
English v. Davis et al
as 2:2015cv00068
Plaintiff:
Michael Dwayne English
Defendant:
Lorenzo Davis and Gary Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00292
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Thomas v. Gary City of et al
as 2:2012cv00532
Plaintiff:
Russell D Thomas
Defendant:
Gary City of, Gary Police Department, L Hairston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00531
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Ballentine v. Birkett et al
as 2:2012cv00236
Plaintiff:
Patricia Ballentine
Defendant:
M Birkett, James Nielsen, Gary Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
