Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Velasquez v. State of Utah et al
as 2:2020cv00205
Plaintiff:
Carlos Velasquez
Defendant:
State of Utah, Utah Division of Aging and Adult Services/APS, Utah Department of Human Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Talbot v. State of Utah et al
as 4:2019cv00079
Defendant:
Brody Keisel, Sean D. Reyes, Holly Ramsay and others
Plaintiff:
Lanny Kay Talbot
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Talbot v. State of Utah et al
as 4:2019cv00051
Defendant:
Sean D. Reyes, State of Utah and Gary R. Herbert
Plaintiff:
Lanny Kay Talbot
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00411
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Planned Parenthood Association of Utah v. Miner et al
as 2:2019cv00238
Defendant:
Sean D. Reyes, Mark B. Steinagel, Sim Gill and others
Plaintiff:
Planned Parenthood Association of Utah
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brebis v. Herbert et al
as 2:2018cv00184
Plaintiff:
Angelique Che Brebis
Defendant:
Gary R. Herbert, John W. Huber and Jackie Biskupski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Prisbry v. Barnes et al
as 2:2017cv00723
Plaintiff:
Terry Prisbry
Defendant:
Keith Barnes , Gary R. Herbert and Matthew B. Durrant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sevier v. Thompson et al
as 2:2016cv00659
Plaintiff:
Chris Sevier
Defendant:
Bryan E. Thompson , Gary R. Herbert and Sean Reyes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sevier v. Herbert et al
as 2:2016cv00124
Plaintiff:
Chris Sevier
Defendant:
Gary R. Herbert, Sean Reyes and Sherrie Swensen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Planned Parenthood v. Herbert, et al
as 15-4189
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PLANNED PARENTHOOD ASSOCIATION OF UTAH
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY R HERBERT, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Utah and JOSEPH K. MINER, M.D., in his official capacity as Executive Director of the Utah Department of Health
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
