Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Wall v. Kiser et al
as 7:2023cv00467
Plaintiff:
Gary Wall
Defendant:
Lt. J. Kiser, A. Gallihar, W. Swiney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wall v. McCowan et al
as 7:2023cv00331
Plaintiff:
Gary Wall
Defendant:
Officer Brian McCowan, Sgt. D. Williams, Sgt. James Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wall v. Engelke et al
as 7:2021cv00052
Defendant:
Marie M. Vargo, A. Fuller and Mark E. Engelke
Plaintiff:
Gary Wall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wall v. Clarke et al
as 7:2019cv00260
Defendant:
A. Duncan, C. Stanley, W. Swiney and others
Plaintiff:
Gary Wall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wall v. Barksdale
as 1:2016cv01430
Petitioner:
Gary Wall
Respondent:
E. Barksdale
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gary Wall v. Jeffrey Artrip
as 16-7308
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GARY WALL
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY ARTRIP, Delta-Building Unit Manager, TORI RAIFORD, Counselor/Unit Manager, J. FANNIN, Lieutenant and others
Gary Wall v. James Wade
as 13-6355
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GARY WALL
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES WADE, Food Services Manager, ROSP, ROBERT ROWLETTE, Assistant Warden of ROSP, T. RAY, Warden of ROSP and others
Defendant:
CAPTAIN K. MCCOY, Employee of ROSP, SERGEANT C. GILBERT, Employee of ROSP, SERGEANT T. ADAMS, Investigator of ROSP and others
Gary Wall v. David Robinson
as 12-7589
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GARY WALL
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID ROBINSON, Regional Director of the VA. D.O.C., KELLY, Chief Warden of SX-I SP, EVERETT, Chief Warden of SX-II SP and others
Wall v. Wade et al
as 7:2011cv00191
Defendant:
Sergeant T. Adams, Corporal Barrowman, K. Crowder-Austin and others
Plaintiff:
Gary Wall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wall v. Robinson et al
as 1:2009cv00574
Plaintiff:
Gary Wall
Defendant:
David Robinson, Kelly, Everett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
