Cases 1 - 10 of 27
18-00003 IH Borrower LP v. Garza
as 1:2024cv01434
Plaintiff:
2018-3 IH Borrower LP
Defendant:
Libby Garza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Garza v. Calhoun Police Dept. et al
as 4:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
Ruben Garza
Defendant:
Calhoun Police Dept. and Arresting Officers Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Forest v. Old Republic Insurance Company et al
as 1:2023cv03087
Plaintiff:
Ricky Forest
Defendant:
Old Republic Insurance Company, Landstar Ranger, Inc. and Michael Garza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
CHAPMAN v. T-MOBILE et al
as 4:2022cv00113
Defendant:
TRUIST BANK, T-MOBILE, T-MOBILE FINANCIAL LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER S RATIO LAFLARE CHAPMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Garza v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00914
Defendant:
Teva Women's Health Inc doing business as Teva Women's Health LLC, Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc, Teva Women's Health LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Laura Garza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
De La Garza v. Decicco et al
as 1:2021cv00808
Defendant:
Daniel J. Decicco, Mid Atlantic Transport Logistics Corporation and AIG Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania
Plaintiff:
Angelica De La Garza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Garza v. Douglas County Superior Court
as 1:2021cv00686
Respondent:
Douglas County Superior Court
Petitioner:
Ruben Garca and Ruben Garza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Garza v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv04528
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Juan Garza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Garza v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv05587
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Maria Garza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
