Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Acer Incorporated et al v. Samsung SDI Co., Ltd et al
as 4:2015cv01948
Plaintiff:
Gateway U.S. Retail, Inc., Acer Inc., Acer America Corporation and others
Defendant:
Samsung SDI Co. Ltd, Samsung SDI America Inc, Hitachi Maxell, Ltd and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
In re: Dell Inc., et al v. John Doe 1
as 14-17502
Not Classified By Court:
In re: OPTICAL DISK DRIVE ANTITRUST LITIGATION and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Antitrust Division
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DELL INC., DELL PRODUCTS, L.P., HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY and others
Appellant:
JOHN DOE 1
Defendant:
TOSHIBA SAMSUNG STORAGE TECHNOLOGY CORP. KOREA, as Liaison Counsel for Defendants and SONY CORPORATION
Acer Inc. et al v. Lite-On It Corporation et al
as 5:2013cv04991
Plaintiff:
Acer Inc. , Acer America Corporation , Gateway, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Lite-On It Corporation, NEC Corporation, Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ACER America Corporation v. Hitachi, Ltd. et al
as 3:2013cv03349
Plaintiff:
Gateway U.S. Retail, Inc., ACER America Corporation, Gateway, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Toshiba Matsushita Display Technology Co., Ltd., NEC Corporation of America, Toshiba Mobile Display Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
In Re: Optical Disk Drive Products Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2010md02143
Plaintiff:
Acer America Corporation, Acer Inc., Alex Afanasyev and others
Defendant:
BenQ America Corp., BenQ Corporation, Hitachi, Ltd. and others
Petitioner:
John Doe 1 and Best Buy Enterprise Services, Inc.
Other:
Christopher Andrews, Debbie Bosse, Mr. Stephen Field and others
Not Yet Classified:
All Parties, Amazon.com, Inc. and Apple Inc.
Intervenor:
Fanshawe College of Applied Arts and Technology and U.S. Department of J Antitrust Division
Interested Party:
Patrick S. Sweeney, Gregory Starrett and Newegg Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
