Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. Apex Spine & Orthopaedics, PLLC et al
as 3:2023cv00590
Plaintiff:
Government Employees Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Defendant:
Apex Spine & Orthopaedics, PLLC, Advanced Pain Consultants, P.A., Erik T. Bendiks, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00548
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disability Act
MCIVER et al v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 1:2020cv00839
Defendant:
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY and GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY
Plaintiff:
ALICIA MCIVER and NATASHA PIERCE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wingo v. GEICO Indemnity Company
as 1:2019cv00144
Plaintiff:
Sharon Wingo
Defendant:
GEICO Indemnity Company
Economy Preferred Insurance Company v. GEICO Indemnity Company et al
as 5:2018cv00280
Plaintiff:
Economy Preferred Insurance Company
Defendant:
GEICO Indemnity Company and David Joseph Denicolais
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tilley et al v. Taranto
as 1:2014cv00189
Plaintiff:
Douglas A. Tilley, Sr. and Donnese Tilley
Defendant:
Nicholas J. Taranto and GEICO Indemnity Company
Cross_claimant:
GEICO Indemnity Company
Cross_defendant:
Nicholas J. Taranto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Baker et al v. GEICO Indemnity Company
as 7:2012cv00338
Defendant:
GEICO Indemnity Company
Plaintiff:
Paul Baker and Kimberly Quattlebaum Baker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Breach of Contract
Vlassitchev v. Government Employees Insurance Company et al
as 5:2009cv00044
Plaintiff:
Alexei Vlassitchev
Defendant:
Government Employees Insurance Company and GEICO Indemnity Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
