Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Kumar v. Bazaarvoice, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00109
Plaintiff:
Anupama Kumar
Defendant:
Bazaarvoice, Inc., Gene Austin, Craig A. Barbarosh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Harris v. Bazaarvoice, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00022
Defendant:
Gene Austin, BV Merger Sub, Inc., BV Parent, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Danny Harris
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Stein v. Bazaarvoice, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00067
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
Defendant:
Bazaarvoice, Inc., Thomas J. Meredith, Gene Austin and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
King v. Bazaarvoice, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01866
Plaintiff:
Harold King
Defendant:
Bazaarvoice, Inc., Thomas J. Meredith, Gene Austin and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Rosenblatt v. Bazaarvoice, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01212
Defendant:
Gene Austin, BV Merger Sub, Inc., BV Parent, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Jordan Rosenblatt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Schlaffer v. Bazaarvoice, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01199
Defendant:
Gene Austin, BV Merger Sub, Inc., BV Parent, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Schlaffer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Austin et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2012cv03190
Plaintiff:
Karon Austin and Gene Austin
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Austin et al v. Boston Scientific Corp.
as 2:2012cv03189
Plaintiff:
Karon Austin and Gene Austin
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Austin et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2012cv03184
Plaintiff:
Karon Austin and Gene Austin
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Austin et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2012cv03187
Plaintiff:
Karon Austin and Gene Austin
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
