Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Gales v. Caine
as 1:2023cv00167
Plaintiff: Gene Gales, Jr.
Defendant: Burr Caine, Kimberly Greene, Unknown Ellis and others
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gales v. The City of Hattiesburg Counsel Members et al
as 2:2016cv00213
Plaintiff: Gene Gales, Jr.
Defendant: The City of Hattiesburg Counsel Members, John Doe, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gales v. Helfrich et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv00022
Plaintiff: Gene Gales, Jr.
Defendant: Robert Helfrich, Zack Vaughn, Kassie Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gales v. Hattiesburg City Counsel et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv00244
Plaintiff: Gene Gales, Jr.
Defendant: Hattiesburg City Counsel, Frazier Bolton, Det. John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gales v. Farmer et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2007cv00485
Plaintiff: Gene Gales
Defendant: Mike Farmer, Mike Farmer, Mike Farmer and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gales v. Epps
as 08-60904
Petitioner - Appellant: GENE GALES
Respondent - Appellee: CHRISTOPHER B EPPS, COMMISSIONER, MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Gales v. Farmer, et al
as 08-60837
Plaintiff - Appellant: GENE GALES
Defendant - Appellee: MIKE FARMER, Sheriff, FRANKLIN D BREWER, Warden, BROOME, Nurse and others
Gales v. Farmer, et al
as 08-60643
Plaintiff - Appellant: GENE GALES
Defendant - Appellee: MIKE FARMER, Sheriff, FRANKLIN D BREWER, Warden, BROOME, Nurse and others
Gales v. Epps
as 08-60608
Petitioner - Appellant: GENE GALES
Respondent - Appellee: CHRISTOPHER B EPPS, COMMISSIONER, MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Gales v. Epps
as 2:2007cv00096
Plaintiff: Gene Gales
Defendant: Christopher B. Epps
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?