Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Ameris Bank v. Richard Harold-Gene Jackson
as 8:2023cv02459
Plaintiff:
Ameris Bank a Georgia state-chartered banking corporation doing business as Balboa Capital Corporation
Defendant:
Richard Harold-Gene Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jackson v. Brown
as 23-10588
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Lawrence Gene Jackson, also known as Lawrence Gene Page
Defendant / Appellee:
Sheriff Brown, Bill Hill and Henderson, SRT Sergeant
Jackson v. Henderson et al
as 3:2023cv01246
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Gene Jackson
Defendant:
FNU Henderson, FNU Weeks, FNU Allman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Dallas County Court System et al
as 3:2023cv00373
Petitioner:
Lawrence Gene Jackson
Respondent:
Dallas County Court System and Dallas County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Dallas County Jail
as 3:2023cv00350
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Gene Jackson and Lawrence Gene Page
Defendant:
Dallas County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Dallas County Court
as 3:2022cv02671
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Gene Jackson and Lawrence Gene Page
Defendant:
Dallas County Court, Bill Hill, Vivian Liu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Dallas County Jail
as 3:2022cv02664
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Gene Jackson and Lawrence Gene Page
Defendant:
Dallas County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Sheriff Brown
as 3:2022cv02408
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Gene Jackson
Defendant:
Sheriff Brown, Bill Hill and NFN Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Randell Jackson v. State of Alaska, et al
as 22-16406
Petitioner / Appellant:
RANDELL GENE JACKSON
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE OF ALASKA and BOB CORDLE, Superintendent, Lemon Creek Correctional Center
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
