Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Whiteside et al v. Sanofi US Services Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00796
Defendant:
Sanofi US Services Inc., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC and Sanofi-Aventis U.S. Inc.
Plaintiff:
Geneva Whiteside and Larry Whiteside
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MURPHY et al v. TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv00971
Plaintiff:
ADRIAN MURPHY, AKEYA SIMPKINS, ALAN YOUNG and others
Defendant:
TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC., TITLEMAX OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INC., TITLEMAX OF GEORGIA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
BUMPERS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2021cv00318
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
GENEVA BUMPERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Cleveland County Court v. Robinson
as 1:2020cv00284
Plaintiff:
Cleveland County Court
Defendant:
Geneva Erin Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
GOLDEN et al v. HIGGINS BENJAMIN, PLLC
as 1:2020cv00627
Plaintiff:
GENEVA GOLDEN and MARK GOLDEN
Defendant:
HIGGINS BENJAMIN, PLLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00325
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Frady v. Monsanto Company
as 1:2019cv00027
Plaintiff:
Geneva Frady
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Joyner v. Berryhill
as 2:2018cv00023
Defendant:
Nancy Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Geneva Joyner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
Baker et al v. Murphy-Brown, LLC
as 7:2014cv00227
Plaintiff:
John Baker , Betty Baker , Mackie Baker and others
Defendant:
Murphy-Brown, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
VAUGHAN v. 3M COMPANY, et al
as 1:2012cv01231
Plaintiff:
GENEVA D. VAUGHAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, A.O. SMITH CORPORATION, AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
