Cases 1 - 10 of 69
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00184
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Gentry Carrier v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-10161
Petitioner:
GENTRY GERAURD CARRIER
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Gentry, James v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 0:2024cv60115
Plaintiff:
James Gentry
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kim v. Sheriff Matt Gentry et al
as 5:2023cv01740
Petitioner:
Mung Sian Kim
Respondent:
Sheriff Matt Gentry and Judge Martha Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jones v. Cullman County Jail
as 5:2023cv01566
Plaintiff:
Mark Ples Jones
Defendant:
Cullman County Jail, Matt Gentry, Kelly Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOSES v. TATE et al
as 5:2023cv00118
Plaintiff:
JASON S MOSES
Defendant:
JOHN TATE, ROY WADE, BAINE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gentry v. Turman et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00251
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Gentry
Defendant:
Blake Turman, Thomas Hugghins and Vikki Boyett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Horton v. Gentry
as 5:2023cv00511
Plaintiff:
David Lee Horton
Defendant:
Matt Gentry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davey v. Osceola County, Florida et al
as 6:2022cv01452
Plaintiff:
Catherine E. Davey
Defendant:
Osceola County, Florida, Officer Be'Anka Wilson, Officer David Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cost v. Gentry et al
as 5:2021cv01581
Petitioner:
James Manely Cost, II
Defendant:
Judge Martha Williams
Respondent:
Sheriff Matt Gentry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
