Cases 1 - 10 of 16
SISK v. IMPD et al
as 4:2023cv00185
Plaintiff:
GEORGE EDWARD SISK
Defendant:
IMPD, INDIANAPOLIS POLICE DEPARTMENT, FEDERAL AUTHORITIES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SISK v. ELSHER et al
as 4:2021cv00058
Petitioner:
GEORGE EDWARD SISK
Respondent:
VIERKMAN and ELSHER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MILLER v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2020cv00689
Plaintiff:
GEORGE EDWARD MILLER, JR. and COOK MEDICAL LLC
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Crayton, Jr. v. Pfeister et al
as 1:2018cv05113
Defendant:
Warden Nicholson, C Owikoti, R. Elazegui and others
Plaintiff:
Tenniel Wyatt and George Edward Crayton, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Sisk v. Superintendent
as 3:2016cv00727
Petitioner:
George Edward Sisk
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sisk v. Superintendent
as 3:2016cv00661
Petitioner:
George Edward Sisk
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SISK v. PENCE et al
as 1:2016cv01855
Defendant:
MICHAEL BARNES, EDWIN G. BUSS, MITCHELL E. DANIELS, JR. and others
Plaintiff:
GEORGE EDWARD SISK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crayton, Jr. v. Cook County Department Of Corrections et al
as 1:2015cv11592
Plaintiff:
George Edward Crayton, Jr.
Defendant:
Cook County Department Of Corrections and Tom Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bitner, individually and as surviving spouse on behalf of George Edward Bitner, deceased v. Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
as 1:2015cv09707
Plaintiff:
Pam Bitner, individually and as surviving spouse on behalf of George Edward Bitner, deceased
Defendant:
Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
