Cases 1 - 10 of 13
First and Rosemary Senior Housing, LP v. Pierre
as 24-2427
Plaintiff:
FIRST AND ROSEMARY SENIOR HOUSING, LP
Defendant:
GEORGE PIERRE
First and Rosemary Senior Housing, LP v. Pierre
as 5:2023cv05702
Plaintiff:
First and Rosemary Senior Housing, LP
Defendant:
George Pierre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Account Receivable
GARZA v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2023cv00038
Plaintiff:
SANDRA GARZA
Defendant:
DONALD J. TRUMP, JULIAN ELIE KHATER and GEORGE PIERRE TANIOS
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy/Deprivation Civil Rights
First and Rosemary Senior Housing, LP v. Pierre
as 5:2022cv04745
Plaintiff:
First and Rosemary Senior Housing, LP
Defendant:
George Pierre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
USA v. George Tanios
as 21-3034
Defendant / Appellant:
George Pierre Tanios
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
PIERRE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv90295
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
GEORGES PIERRE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
George Pierre v. C. Nicoll, et al
as 13-17098
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE PIERRE
Defendant - Appellee:
C. DIANA NICOLL, M.D., Acting Director, SFVAMC, JOANN PETERS, Chief Social Worker SFVAMC, BRIAN DOBBS, Social Worker, SFVAMC and others
Pierre et al v. Kroger Texas LP
as 3:2013cv03453
Plaintiff:
Mae Pierre and George Pierre
Defendant:
Kroger Texas LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pierre v. Niklaus et al
as 5:2013cv03803
Plaintiff:
George Pierre
Defendant:
Jenny Niklaus, Teresa Schmitz, EHC Board of Directors and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Pierre v. Nicoll et al
as 3:2013cv02427
Plaintiff:
George Pierre
Defendant:
C. Diana Nicoll , Joann Peters , Brian Dobbs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
