Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Wright v. Holder, et al
as 3:2009cv01322
Petitioner:
Qulen Wright
Respondent:
Eric Holder, Janet Napolitano, Ethan Enzer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Bourguignon v. Sullivan et al
as 3:2009cv00598
Petitioner:
Bristout Bourguignon and Bristout Bourguignon
Respondent:
George Sullivan, Bruce Chadbourne, Department of Homeland Sec and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Dennis v. Salisbury et al
as 1:2008cv00299
Petitioner:
Gregory Dennis
Respondent:
Wayne Salisbury, Michael Chertoff, Michael Mukasey and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00842
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Spahi v. Sullivan et al
as 3:2008cv00047
Plaintiff:
Mikel Spahi
Defendant:
George Sullivan, Bureau of Immigration & Customs Enforcement and Byron
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Tairi v. Mukasey et al
as 3:2007cv01876
Petitioner:
Remzi Tairi
Respondent:
Michael Mukasey, Dept of Homeland Security, Julie Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Freitas v. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 3:2007cv01670
Petitioner:
Armando Freitas
Respondent:
Department of Homeland Security, Michael Kesiler, Julie Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv01544
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Lewis v. Sullivan et al
as 3:2007cv01010
Petitioner:
Phillip Lewis
Respondent:
George Sullivan, Michael Chertoff and Alberto Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
