Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Robin Mukadam et al v. George Thomas Dave et al
as 2:2023cv10514
Plaintiff:
Robin Mukadam, Anastasia Overton, Heidi Wollerman and others
Defendant:
George Thomas Dave, GT's Living Foods, LLC and GTs Living Foods, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
BELL et al v. DAVE et al
as 2:2021cv11816
Plaintiff:
GABRIELLA BELL, LAD JOSEPH BELL, HERMOINE KING and others
Defendant:
GEORGE THOMAS DAVE and GT'S LIVING FOODS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Jonathan Retta, et al v. Millennium Products, Inc., et al
as 17-56412
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JONATHAN RETTA, KIRSTEN SCHOFIELD, JESSICA MANIRE, on Behalf of Themselves and all Others Similarly Situated and others
Objector - Appellant:
PATRICK S. SWEENEY
Defendant - Appellee:
MILLENNIUM PRODUCTS, INC., WHOLE FOODS MARKET, INC. and GEORGE THOMAS DAVE, AKA George Thomas "GT Dave"
Jonathan Retta, et al v. Millennium Products, Inc., et al
as 17-56375
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JONATHAN RETTA, KIRSTEN SCHOFIELD, JESSICA MANIRE, on Behalf of Themselves and all Others Similarly Situated and others
Objector - Appellant:
JUSTIN FERENCE
Defendant - Appellee:
MILLENNIUM PRODUCTS, INC., WHOLE FOODS MARKET, INC. and GEORGE THOMAS DAVE, AKA George Thomas "GT Dave"
Nina Pedro et al v. Millennium Products, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv03780
Defendant:
George Thomas Dave, Millennium Products Inc and Whole Foods Market California Inc
Plaintiff:
Roseline Lewis and Nina Pedro
Pedro et al v. Millennium Products, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv05253
Defendant:
Millennium Products, Inc., George Thomas Dave and Whole Foods Market California, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Nina Pedro and Roseline Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Irma Valencia et al v. Millennium Products Inc et al
as 2:2011cv08914
Defendant:
George Thomas Dave, Does and Millennium Products Inc
Plaintiff:
Jose A Figueroa, Elmer A Garcia, Nicolas Hernandez and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
