Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Nickoson v. Trent et al
as 3:2022cv00087
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Lee Nickoson
Defendant:
George Trent, Rachael Baumgardner, Alan Barnett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wasanyi v. Trent
as 5:2020cv00225
Petitioner:
David M. Wasanyi
Respondent:
Berkeley County and George Trent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mutafis v. North Central Regional Jail et al
as 5:2016cv00004
Plaintiff:
Michael Theodore Mutafis
Defendant:
North Central Regional Jail, Prime Care Medical, Dept. of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. West Virginia Division of Corrections et al
as 2:2015cv01544
Plaintiff:
Matthew Martin
Defendant:
West Virginia Division of Corrections , James Rubenstein , George Trent and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hillberry v. Elder et al
as 5:2013cv00113
Plaintiff:
Roy Franklin Hillberry, II
Defendant:
R. Elder, W. O. Stewart, Reta Mays and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hillberry v. Elder et al
as 2:2013cv21894
Plaintiff:
Roy Franklin Hillberry, II
Defendant:
R. Elder, W. O. Stewart, Reta Mays and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pitts v. North Central Regional Jail et al
as 5:2013cv00100
Plaintiff:
James E. Pitts, Jr.
Defendant:
North Central Regional Jail, George Trent, Rodger Elder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Newton v. North Central Regional Jail et al
as 5:2013cv00076
Plaintiff:
Ricky Jermaine Newton
Defendant:
North Central Regional Jail and George Trent
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chicarelli v. Trent
as 1:2013cv00103
Petitioner:
Andrew L. Chicarelli
Respondent:
George Trent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dillow v. North Central Regional Jail
as 2:2012cv00071
Plaintiff:
John Hamilton Dillow
Defendant:
George Trent
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
