Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Velez v. Thaler et al
as 5:2016cv00132
Defendant:
FNU LNU and Rick Thaler
Plaintiff:
George Velez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
George Velez v. William Stephens, Director, et al
as 15-20347
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE VELEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, PHYSICIAN MEDICAL - STAFF UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDCIAL BRANCH, Director, JOHN SEALY STATE HOSPITAL and others
Velez v. Stephens et al
as 4:2015cv01281
Plaintiff:
George Velez
Defendant:
William Stephens, Physician Medical - Staff UTMB, John Sealy State Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Velez v. Stephens et al
as 5:2014cv00800
Defendant:
FNU LNU and William Stephens
Plaintiff:
George Velez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
George Velez v. Branda Kennedy, et al
as 14-50315
Petitioner - Appellant:
GEORGE VELEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Velez v. Travis County Sheriffs Dept. et al
as 1:2014cv00179
Defendant:
Sheriff Greg Hamilton and Travis County Sheriffs Dept.
Plaintiff:
George Velez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Velez v. Medical et al
as 1:2014cv00139
Defendant:
Director Medical and Director Texas Dept. of Criminal Justice
Plaintiff:
George Velez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Velez v. Kennedy
as 1:2014cv00133
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Respondent:
Branda P. Kennedy
Petitioner:
George Velez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Velez v. Walsh
as 10-873
Petitioner - Appellant:
George Velez
Respondent - Appellee:
James J. Walsh, Superintendent
Velez v. Walsh
as 1:2007cv01037
Petitioner:
George Velez
Respondent:
James J. Walsh and James J. Walsh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
