Cases 1 - 10 of 239
Moore v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv00167
Plaintiff:
Georgia Moore
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hayes v. Shelby et al
as 3:2023cv03053
Plaintiff:
Leon Hayes
Defendant:
Warden Georgia Shelby, Sargent Reginald Brown, Correctional Officer Michelle McClain and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00166
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Daughdrill v. Georgia-Pacific Monticello, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv00064
Plaintiff:
Jody Daughdrill
Defendant:
Georgia-Pacific Monticello, LLC and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Craig v. Roberson et al
as 3:2021cv00767
Plaintiff:
Kisha M. Craig
Defendant:
Gemorman Roberson, Strategic Delivery Solutions, LLC, Hoft, LLC doing business as Hertz of Tupelo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Norwood v. Georgia-Pacific Monticello LLC et al
as 2:2021cv00149
Plaintiff:
Ruth Norwood
Defendant:
Georgia-Pacific Monticello LLC, John Does 1-5 and XYZ Corporations 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Henderson v. Shelby
as 1:2021cv00336
Plaintiff:
Peter Henderson
Defendant:
Georgia Shelby
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00140
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Owens et al v. Hayes et al
as 1:2021cv00301
Plaintiff:
Charles Douglas Owens, II and Jess Lee Green
Defendant:
Lawanda Hayes, Ronnie Lampley, Georgia Shelby and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00474
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
