Cases 1 - 7 of 7
EATON et al v. MYLAN LABORATORIES LTD. et al
as 1:2023cv04114
Plaintiff:
GERALD LEE EATON and NANCY P. EATON
Defendant:
MYLAN LABORATORIES, LTD., MYLAN N.V., MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and others
In Re:
VALSARTAN LOSARTAN AND IRBESARTAN PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gerald Fisher v. US Dept of Justice
as 16-4120
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GERALD LEE FISHER
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
FISHER v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 2:2016cv01618
Plaintiff:
GERALD LEE FISHER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Abney et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 3:2013cv04213
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Abney , Therese Andrezewski , Arthur Lee Archer and others
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY , SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. L.L.C. , SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
ALBRECHT et al v. A.C. AND S., INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY) et al
as 2:2010cv64000
Plaintiff:
GERALD LEE EGLE and JOYCE EGLE
Defendant:
A.C. AND S., INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY), A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON v. A.M. LOCKETT & CO., ET AL.
as 2:2008cv77032
Plaintiff:
GERALD LEE JOHNSON and GERALD LEE JOHNSON
Defendant:
A.M. LOCKETT & COMPANY, LTD., A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ALLIED EQUIPMENT, INCORPORATED and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
ARBERRY et al v. A.C. AND S. INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY) et al
as 2:2007cv66366
Plaintiff:
EARL ARBERRY, LOUISE ARBERRY, LARRY J. BAILEY and others
Defendant:
A.C. AND S. INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY), A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
