Cases 1 - 10 of 29
(PC) Harper v. Sherman et al
as 2:2021cv00660
Defendant:
Richard Milam, Stu Sherman, William Elszy and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Harper and Jason Scott Harper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Harper v. Sherman et al
as 1:2021cv00639
Defendant:
Richard Milam, Stu Sherman, M. Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Scott Harper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harper v. Sherman et al
as 2:2021at00337
Defendant:
Richard Milam, Stu Sherman, William Elszy and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Harper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ashbritt, Inc. v. Mark Ghilarducci, et al
as 21-15581
Defendant / Appellee:
KEN DAROSA, Individually and as Acting Director of the California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery and MARK GHILARDUCCI, Individually and as Director of the California Governors Office of Emergency Services
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ASHBRITT, INC., a Florida Corporation
(PC) Gaeta v. Sherman et al
as 2:2020cv02258
Defendant:
O. Ronquillo, M. Davis, William Elszy and others
Plaintiff:
Luis Gaeta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
(PC) Gaeta v. Sherman et al
as 1:2020cv01630
Defendant:
O. Ronquillo, M. Davis, William Elszy and others
Plaintiff:
Luis Gaeta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GHILARDUCCI v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv85336
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM GHILARDUCCI
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ashbritt, Inc. v. Ghilarducci et al
as 3:2020cv04612
Defendant:
Ken Darosa and Mark Ghilarducci
Plaintiff:
ASHBRITT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stanislaus Funding, Inc. v. Gavin Newsom et al
as 2:2020cv04646
Defendant:
Janice Hahn, Federal Glover, Don Barnes and others
Plaintiff:
Stanislaus Funding, Inc. d/b/a Patioworld and Stanislaus Funding, Inc. a California corporation doing business as Patioworld
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
