Cases 1 - 10 of 316
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2024cv00672
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Watson v. Dotson et al
as 7:2024cv00268
Plaintiff:
Darrell N. Watson
Defendant:
Chadwick S. Dotson, Warden Rick White, Captain Gilbert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooper v. Med Staff of RRJ et al
as 2:2024cv00253
Plaintiff:
Thad Gilbert Cooper
Defendant:
Med Staff of RRJ, Macky and Portia Bennactt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2024cv00630
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Cooper v. Mullen et al
as 7:2024cv00258
Plaintiff:
Thad Gilbert Cooper
Defendant:
B. Mullen and WRSP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooper v. Med Staff of RRJ et al
as 2:2024cv00244
Plaintiff:
Thad Gilbert Cooper
Defendant:
Med Staff of RRJ, Dental at RRJ and Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2024cv00574
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2024cv00528
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Rivera v. Anderson et al
as 7:2024cv00224
Plaintiff:
Denis Alberto Rivera
Defendant:
David Anderson, Harold W. Clarke, Randall C. Mathena and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Gilbert et al
as 7:2024cv00213
Plaintiff:
Charles Kenzell Carter
Defendant:
Gilbert, Collins, Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
