Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 42
In re: Gilbert Hyatt
as 22-5054
In Re: In re: Gilbert P. Hyatt
Hyatt v. PTO We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-2324
Plaintiff / Appellant: GILBERT P. HYATT
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, ANDREI IANCU, ANDREW HIRSHFELD, Performing the Functions and Duties of the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office and others
Hyatt v. PTO We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-1708
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, ANDREW HIRSHFELD, Performing the Functions and Duties of the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office and ANDREW HIRSHFELD, Acting Deputy Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Acting Deputy Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Plaintiff / Appellant: GILBERT P. HYATT
Hyatt v. Hirshfeld
as 20-2323
Plaintiff / Appellee: GILBERT P. HYATT
Defendant / Appellant: ANDREI IANCU, Director, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, ANDREW HIRSHFELD, Performing the Functions and Duties of the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office and ANDREI IANCU, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Hyatt v. Hirshfeld
as 20-2325
Defendant / Appellant: ANDREI IANCU, Director, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Director of the USPTO, ANDREI IANCU, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Director of the USPTO and ANDREW HIRSHFELD, Performing the Functions and Duties of the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Director of the USPTO
Plaintiff / Appellee: GILBERT P. HYATT
Hyatt v. Hirshfeld We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-2321
Plaintiff / Appellee: GILBERT P. HYATT
Defendant / Appellant: ANDREI IANCU, Director, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, ANDREI IANCU, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office and ANDREW HIRSHFELD, Performing the Functions and Duties of the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Hyatt v. Hirshfeld
as 20-2324
Plaintiff / Appellee: GILBERT P. HYATT
Defendant / Appellant: ANDREI IANCU, Director, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, ANDREW HIRSHFELD, Performing the Functions and Duties of the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office and ANDREI IANCU, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Gilbert Hyatt v. U.S. Patent & Trademark Office
as 20-1923
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES PATENT & TRADEMARK OFFICE and ANDREI IANCU, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, in his official capacity
Plaintiff / Appellant: GILBERT P. HYATT
Hyatt v. United States Patent and Trademark Office et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00487
Defendant: Andrei Iancu and United States Patent and Trademark Office
Plaintiff: Gilbert P. Hyatt
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1071
Gilbert Hyatt, et al v. OMB, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-15590
Plaintiff / Appellant: AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR EQUITABLE TREATMENT, INC. and GILBERT P. HYATT
Defendant / Appellee: MICK MULVANEY, in his official capacity as Director of the Office of Management and Budget and OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?