Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Cases 21 - 30 of 85
Boothe v. Rossrock Fund II LP
as 17-1948
Plaintiff - Appellant: Claudette Boothe
Defendant - Appellee: Rossrock Fund II LP, Flushing Bank, James H. Ross and others
Defendant: John Does 1-100, all person unknown, claiming any legal or equitable right, title, estate, lien, or interest in the property described in the complaint adverse to plaintiff's title or any cloud on plaintiff's title thereto
Vermont Alliance for Ethical H v. Hoser
as 17-1481
Plaintiff / Appellee: Vermont Alliance for Ethical Healthcare, Inc. and Christian Medical & Dental Associations
Defendant: William K. Hoser, in his official capacity as Chair of the Vermont Board of Medical Practice, Michael A. Drew, M.D., in his official capacity as a Member of the Vermont Board of Medical Practice, Allen Evans, in his official capacity as a Member of the Vermont Board of Medical Practice and others
Intervenor: Monica van de Ven, Benedict Underhill, Compassion & Choices and others
Vermont Alliance for Ethical H v. Hoser
as 17-1481
Plaintiff - Appellee: Vermont Alliance for Ethical Healthcare, Inc. and Christian Medical & Dental Associations, Inc.
Defendant: William K. Hoser, in his official capacity as Chair of the Vermont Board of Medical Practice, Michael A. Drew, M.D., in his official capacity as a Member of the Vermont Board of Medical Practice, Allen Evans, in his official capacity as a Member of the Vermont Board of Medical Practice and others
Intervenor - Appellant: Monica van de Ven, Benedict Underhill, Compassion & Choices and others
United States of America v. Dowe (Brian Gill) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-1444
Appellee USA: United States of America
Defendant: Sean Dupree, # 82661-053, MDC Brooklyn, P.O. Box 329002, Brooklyn, NY 11232, Derrick Lewis, AKA Boobie, Donald Lewis, AKA Don Don and others
Defendant - Appellant: Brian Gill, # 82702-053, MDC Brooklyn, Metropolitan Detention Center, P.O. Box 329002 Brooklyn, NY 11232, AKA Brawl, David Gill, AKA Plot and Samuel Waco McIntosh, AKA Samuel McIntosh, AKA Waco
Terrence v. Senkowski
as 14-3516
Petitioner: Gill Terrence
Respondent: Daniel A. Senkowski, Superintendent, Clinton Correctional Facility
Lasonde v. Seabrook
as 14-2277
Plaintiff - Appellant: Chandra Lasonde
Defendant: United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York
Defendant - Appellee: Norman Seabrook, in his individual and official capacity as a Correction Officer for the New York City Department of Correction, Elias Husamudeen, in his individual and official capacity as a Correction Officer for the New York City Department of Correction, Joseph Bracco and others
Kregler v. City of New York
as 14-1045
Plaintiff - Appellant: William Kregler
Defendant - Appellee: City of New York, Louis Garcia, Brian Grogan and others
Gill v. Bausch & Lomb Supplemental
as 14-1058
Plaintiff - Appellee: Daniel E. Gill, Thomas C. McDermott and Jay T. Holmes
Defendant - Appellant: Bausch & Lomb Supplemental Retirement Income Plan I, Bausch & Lomb Incorporated and Compensation Committee of the Bausch & Lomb Board of Directors
Flemming v. Rock
as 14-803
Plaintiff - Appellant: Woodrow Flemming
Defendant - Appellee: William H. Chase, Sergeant at Upstate Correctional Facility, Neal J. Lavigne, Correctional Officer at Upstate Correctional Facility, David Rock, Superintent at Upstate Correctional Facility and others
New York State Rifle and Pisto v. Cuomo
as 14-37
Plaintiff - Appellee-Cross-Appellant: William Nojay, Thomas Galvin, Roger Horvath and others
Defendant: Frank A. Sedita, III, District Attorney for Erie County, Gerald J. Gill, Chief of Police for the Town of Lancaster, New York and Lawrence Friedman
Defendant - Appellant-Cross-Appellee: Andrew M. Cuomo, Governor of the State of New York, Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General of the State of New York and Joseph A. D'Amico, Superintendent of the New York State Police

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?