Cases 11 - 20 of 42
Gilles v. The People of the State of California et al
as 3:2019cv01075
Defendant:
DOES 1-10, San Diego Police Department, The People of the State of California and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Christopher Gilles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00390
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Martin v. QBE Insurance Corporation et al
as 3:2018cv02439
Defendant:
QBE Insurance Corporation and Does 1 through 10
Plaintiff:
Gary Gill Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 bc
Newsome v. Gill et al
as 3:2018cv01938
Defendant:
Cynthia Aaron, Judith Haller, Judge Judith McConnell and others
Plaintiff:
Mario A. Newsome
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Gilles v. Discover Bank et al
as 3:2017cv02357
Plaintiff:
Miho Gilles
Defendant:
Discover Bank and DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv02351
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 ed
Dorsey et al v. Kreep et al
as 3:2017cv00871
Plaintiff:
Wesley C. Dorsey , Jr. and Margarete S. Dorsey
Defendant:
Gary Kreep, Kerry Wells, Charles R. Gill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dorsey et al v. The Leavitt Investment Company et al
as 3:2017cv00615
Plaintiff:
Wesley C. Dorsey , Jr. and Margarete S. Dorsey
Defendant:
The Leavitt Investment Company, San Diego Properties and Management, Monica Cuevas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gilles v. Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company
as 3:2016cv02461
Plaintiff:
Stephen Gilles
Defendant:
Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carroll v. Ahboot et al
as 3:2016cv01853
Plaintiff:
Tremayne Deon Carroll
Defendant:
Bita Ahboot, Amir Abdin, Gill Garcetti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
