Cases 21 - 30 of 37
Ramada Worldwide Inc v. G & G Hotel Development LLC et al
as 2:2013mc00016
Plaintiff:
Ramada Worldwide Inc
Defendant:
G & G Hotel Development LLC, Gurmeet S Gill and Gurinderjit S Purewal
DePuy Synthes Sales, Inc. v. Gill
as 2:2013cv00376
Plaintiff:
DePuy Synthes Sales Inc
Defendant:
Martin Gill
Counter_claimant:
Martin Gill
Counter_defendant:
DePuy Synthes Sales Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gill v. DePuy Spine LLC et al
as 2:2013cv00252
Plaintiff:
Martin Gill
Defendant:
DePuy Spine LLC , DePuy Synthes Sales Inc and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Almendarez et al v. BNSF Railway Company
as 2:2013cv00086
Plaintiff:
Armando Almendarez , Daniel Crosby , Aaron Drecksel and others
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Blatt v. Shove et al
as 2:2011cv01711
Plaintiff:
Leon S Blatt
Defendant:
Pete Shove, Jeffrey Franzen, Jeremy King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Westmoore Management LLC et al
as 2:2011mc00137
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Westmoore Management LLC, Westmoore Investment LP, Westmoore Capital Management Inc and others
Receiver:
David A Gill
Gill v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, L.P.
as 2:2011cv01186
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Gill
Defendant:
BAC Home Loans Servicing, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hannah v. New Jersey State Police et al
as 3:2011cv05513
Plaintiff:
Peter Paul Hannah
Defendant:
New Jersey State Police, New Jersey Sheriff, Washington State Police and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00958
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Little v. Martin-Morris et al
as 2:2011cv00091
Plaintiff:
Brenda Joyce Little
Defendant:
Harium Martin-Morris , Kay Blume-Smith , Michael DeBell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
