Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Kyles v. Giroux et al
as 1:2026cv02027
Defendant:
Melissa Gilles, Sgt Nicholas Klimpke and Richard Giroux
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo D Kyles, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tinnon, Andre v. Giroux, C.C.I. Warden et al
as 3:2026cv01020
Plaintiff:
Andre L. Tinnon
Defendant:
C.C.I. Warden Giroux and C.O. Jordan Mazur
Unknown:
CCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Giroux et al
as 3:2026cv00989
Plaintiff:
Adam M. Miller
Defendant:
Rich Giroux, Erin Dunahay, Casey Jensen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Giroux et al
as 2:2026cv01781
Plaintiff:
Adam M Miller
Defendant:
Rich Giroux, Erin Dunahay, Casey Jensen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Giroux v. MSC Cruises, S.A.
as 1:2026cv26592
Plaintiff:
Alice Giroux
Defendant:
MSC Cruises, S.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Tinnon, Andre v. Giroux et al
as 3:2026cv00964
Plaintiff:
Andre L. Tinnon
Defendant:
Warden Giroux, Captain Kevin Pitzen and Sgt. Jeneffer L. Peterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Giroux v. Richard et al
as 1:2026cv00275
Plaintiff:
Emily Giroux
Defendant:
Quentin Richard and Paschall Truck Lines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Sutrick, Dennis v. Giroux, Richard
as 3:2026cv00952
Petitioner:
Dennis Henry Sutrick
Respondent:
Warden Richard Giroux
Unknown:
GBCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Earls v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2026cv01459
Petitioner:
Fairly W Earls
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons, Director Michael Carvajal, Director Andre Matevcusian and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Rogers v. Giroux
as 2:2026cv01428
Petitioner:
Adam Pierre Rogers
Respondent:
Richard Giroux
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
