Cases 1 - 10 of 426
Meas v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2024cv00138
Plaintiff:
Jerry Meals and Jerry Meas
Defendant:
State of Nevada, James Dzurenda, Charles Daniels and others
Interested Party:
Nevada Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ackerman v. Rigney et al
as 2:2024cv00935
Plaintiff:
Jin Ackerman
Defendant:
Curtis Rigney, T. Phelps, William Gittere and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2024cv00923
Plaintiff:
JoAquin Hill
Defendant:
State of Nevada, Nevada Department of Corrections, Ely State Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edmiston v. Saucedo, et al.
as 24-3145
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN EDMISTON
Defendant:
RICARDO SAUCEDO, JAMES WEILAND, C.E.R.T. "Senior and WILLIAM GITTERE, added per #7 Screening Order; #8 AC
Cabalan v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2024cv00137
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Cabalan
Defendant:
State of Nevada, James Dzurenda, Charles Daniels and others
Interested Party:
Nevada Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Emil v. Gittere, et al.
as 24-3080
Petitioner:
RODNEY L. EMIL
Respondent:
WILLIAM GITTERE, ADAM PAUL LAXALT and TIMOTHY FILSON
Welch v. Robinson et al
as 2:2024cv00500
Plaintiff:
Kentrell D. Welch
Defendant:
Dr. Robinson, Amanda Allred, Dons Perkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzales v. Gittere et al
as 2:2024cv00816
Petitioner:
Raul Gonzales
Respondent:
Warden William Gittere and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cortez v. Stubbs, et al.
as 24-2714
Plaintiff:
MOISES JOSUE CORTEZ
Defendant:
BRANDON STUBBS, FAC ECF No. 33, JOSE GUZMAN, FAC ECF No. 33, MATTHEW ROMAN and others
Damaste Productions, Inc v. TGIM Films, Inc et al
as 2:2024cv03183
Plaintiff:
Damaste Productions, Inc
Defendant:
TGIM Films, Inc and Eric Gitter
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
