Cases
Amber Doe v. Sequoia Capital et al
as 2:2023cv06439
Plaintiff: Amber Doe
Defendant: Sequoia Capital, Michael Lewis Goguen, Two Bear Capital and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Doe v. Sequoia Capital et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2023cv00088
Plaintiff: Amber Baptiste
Defendant: Sequoia Capital, Michael Lewis Goguen, Two Bear Capital and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Doe v. Sequoia Capital et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv05881
Plaintiff: Amber Doe
Defendant: Sequoia Capital, Michael Lewis Goguen, Two Bear Capital and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
BAPTISTE v. VOX MEDIA, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv02161
Plaintiff: AMBER BAPTISTE
Defendant: VOX MEDIA, INC., SEQUOIA CAPITAL, MICHAEL LEWIS GOGUEN and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Amber Doe v. Michael Lewis Goguen et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv02280
Plaintiff: Amber Doe
Defendant: Michael Lewis Goguen, Sequoia Capital, Two Bear Capital and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Mcube Petroleum Inc et al v. Glaser Weil Fink Jacobs Howard & Shapiro LLP We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2009cv05661
Receiver: William L Beecher and William L Beecher
Plaintiff: Mcube Petroleum Inc, Mcube Petroleum Inc, Basilam Petroleum LLC and others
Defendant: Glaser Weil Fink Jacobs Howard & Shapiro LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Type: Torts - Injury None
Reifler v. Glaser, Weil, Fink, Jacobs, Howard & Shapiro, L.L.P. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv08320
Plaintiff: Bradley Reifler
Defendant: Glaser, Weil, Fink, Jacobs, Howard & Shapiro, L.L.P.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?