Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Glasscock v. Kelsey et al
as 4:2023cv00518
Plaintiff:
Steven Glasscock
Defendant:
Jason Kelsey and USPS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Manning v. Boyle et al
as 1:2023cv00708
Plaintiff:
Sitges Manning
Defendant:
Donald B. Boyle, Susan K. Muthart, Governor's Place Condominium Association and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Glasscock v. State of Utah
as 4:2018cv00044
Petitioner:
David Glasscock
Defendant:
State of Utah
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Glasscock v. State of Utah
as 4:2018cv00004
Petitioner:
David Glasscock
Respondent:
State of Utah
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Steinberg v. Bennett et al (Case Consolidated with 12-2722 - All Filings To Be Made in Lead Case 12-2722)
as 2:2013cv02235
Plaintiff:
David Steinberg
Defendant:
Robert R. Bennett, Gordon M. Bethune, Larry C. Glasscock and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Gerbino v. Sprint Nextel Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv02722
Plaintiff:
Paul Gerbino
Defendant:
Sprint Nextel Corporation, Robert R. Bennett, Gordon M. Bethune and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Robaczynski v. Hesse et al
as 2:2012cv02354
Plaintiff:
Stephen Robaczynski
Defendant:
Daniel R. Hesse , Robert R. Bennett , Gordon M. Bethune and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NECA-IBEW Pension Trust Plan v. Hesse et al
as 2:2012cv02336
Plaintiff:
NECA-IBEW Pension Trust Plan
Defendant:
Daniel R. Hesse , Robert R. Bennett , Gordon M. Bethune and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rich et al v. Hesse et al
as 2:2012cv02294
Plaintiff:
Jared Rich and Kurtis Friesen
Defendant:
Daniel R. Hesse , Robert R. Bennett , Gordon M. Bethune and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hartleib v. Hesse et al
as 2:2012cv02266
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Hartleib
Defendant:
Daniel R. Hesse, Robert R. Bennett, Gordon M. Bethune and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
