Cases filed in New Jersey
Cases 1 - 10 of 3,915
WILSON v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv21276
Plaintiff: ANDREA WILSON
Defendant: JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., GLAXOSMITHKLINE CONSUMER HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS (US) d/b/a HALEON, PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
LOUISIANA WHOLESALE DRUG CO., INC. v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv00995
Defendant: TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS, GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC formerly SmithKline Beecham Corp. d/b/a/ GlaxoSmithKline and others
Interested Party: MEIJER INC.
Amicus Curiae: FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Lead Plaintiff: KING DRUG COMPANY OF FLORENCE, INC., LOUISIANA WHOLESALE DRUG CO., INC. and ROCHESTER DRUG CO-OPERATIVE, INC.
Not Yet Classified: MEIJER DISTRIBUTION, INC., MORRIS & DICKSON CO., L.L.C., FWK HOLDINGS LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
BARTON et al v. RB HEALTH (US) LLC et al
as 2:2023cv20370
Plaintiff: ERIN BARTON, KIMBERLY BUSCAGLIA, FRANCIS W. CATANESE and others
Defendant: RECKITT BENCKISER LLC, KENVUE, INC., MCNEIL CONSUMER HEALTHCARE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ADKINS et al v. RECKITT BENCKISER PHARMACEUTICALS INC. et al
as 2:2023cv20743
Plaintiff: MILLARD ADKINS, ROSALYN ANDERSON, ELI ERLICK and others
Defendant: RECKITT BENCKISER PHARMACEUTICALS INC., THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
RICHARTZ et al v. BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 3:2023cv03584
Plaintiff: PAUL RICHARTZ and LINDA RICHARTZ
Defendant: BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM CORPORATION, BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM USA CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Product Liability
MORRIS & DICKSON CO., L.L.C. v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv02956
Defendant: GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC formerly known as SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION doing business as GLAXOSMITHKLINE, SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION, TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD and others
Plaintiff: MORRIS & DICKSON CO., L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
FWK HOLDINGS, LLC. v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv02958
Defendant: GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC formerly known as SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION doing business as GLAXOSMITHKLINE, SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION, TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD and others
Plaintiff: FWK Holdings LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
MLI RX LLC et al v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv02960
Defendant: GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC formerly known as SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION doing business as GLAXOSMITHKLINE, SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION, TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD and others
Plaintiff: MLI RX LLC, AMERISOURCEBERGEN CORP., AMERISOURCEBERGEN DRUG CORP. and others
Interested Party: GlaxoSmithKline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
GREGORY v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES et al
as 2:2023cv02648
Plaintiff: RICHARD GREGORY and Holly Gregory
Defendant: LABORATORIES ABBOTT, ASTRAZENECA PHAMACEUTICALS LP, ASTRAZENECA LP and others
In Re: PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (NO.II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WASHINGTON v. ASTRAZENECA LP et al
as 2:2023cv01621
In Re: PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (NO.II)
Plaintiff: BRENDA WASHINGTON
Defendant: ASTRAZENECA LP, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, GLAXOSMITHKLINE CONSUMER HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS (US) LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?