Cases 1 - 10 of 92
Glenn v. Vision Service Plan
as 2:2023cv02500
Plaintiff:
Glenna Glenn
Defendant:
Vision Service Plan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Richard Guzman et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2023cv08689
Plaintiff:
Richard Guzman, Richard Alba, Edward Arca and others
Defendant:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Tolentino v. Saito
as 1:2023cv00286
Plaintiff:
Arthur B. Tolentino, Rick V. Paulino, Jeanine Lum and others
Defendant:
Paul Saito, Glenn Saito, Sam Fujikawa and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Tolentino v. Saito
as 1:2023cv00280
Plaintiff:
Arthur B. Tolentino, Rick V. Paulino, Jeanine Lum and others
Defendant:
Paul Saito, Glenn Saito, Sam Fujikawa and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Cortez v. Pena Family LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00730
Plaintiff:
Juan Carlos Cortez
Defendant:
Pena Family LLC, Hickman's Egg Ranch Incorporated, Salvador Pena and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Adams v. Fultz et al
as 3:2022cv00956
Plaintiff:
Renee Adams
Defendant:
Judy Fultz, Gordon Fultz, Judy A. Fultz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Tolentino v. Saito
as 1:2021cv00429
Plaintiff:
Arthur B. Tolentino, Rick V. Paulino and Jeanine Lum
Defendant:
Paul Saito, Glenn Saito, Sam Fujikawa and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109
Fite v. SYSCO SACRAMENTO, INC.
as 2:2021at00853
Plaintiff:
Glenn Fite
Defendant:
SYSCO SACRAMENTO, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fite v. Sysco Sacramento, Inc.
as 2:2021cv01633
Plaintiff:
Glenn Fite
Defendant:
Sysco Sacramento, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fite v. Shamrock Foods Company et al
as 2:2021at00009
Defendant:
John Fernandes and Shamrock Foods Company
Plaintiff:
Glenn Fite
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
