Cases 21 - 30 of 78
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv01170
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Wright v. Haslam et al
as 3:2013cv01042
Plaintiff:
Glenn Rodney Wright
Defendant:
Bill Haslam, Pilot Flying J, Memphis Government and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. Haslam et al
as 3:2013cv01045
Plaintiff:
Glenn Rodney Wright
Defendant:
Bill Haslam, Fort Campbell Clarksville Military Base, Steve Cotten and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv02166
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Wright v. Transportation & Infratructure Ind et al
as 3:2013cv00284
Plaintiff:
Glenn Rodney Wright
Defendant:
Transportation & Infratructure Ind, Oversight GOV-Reform, Ways & Means and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv03173
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wright v. U.S. Broadcasting Station et al
as 2:2011cv02603
Plaintiff:
Glenn Rodney Wright
Defendant:
U.S. Broadcasting Station, U.S. Inner City Satellite, COGIC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. Topaz Computed Signature System et al
as 2:2011cv02588
Plaintiff:
Glenn Rodney Wright
Defendant:
Topaz Computed Signature System, Memphis Sheriff Dept., U.S. Techno and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. Memphis D.E.A. et al
as 2:2011cv02584
Plaintiff:
Glenn Rodney Wright
Defendant:
Memphis D.E.A., Police, Memphis DG Duty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. Memphis Government Police/Sheriff et al
as 2:2011cv02578
Plaintiff:
Glenn Rodney Wright
Defendant:
Memphis Government Police/Sheriff, Schneider Transport and Memphis Career Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
