Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Adam Goldman v. Sheriff of Polk County, Florida, et al
as 22-11308
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ADAM GOLDMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
SHERIFF OF POLK COUNTY, FLORIDA, HOWARD L. DIMMIG, II, Public Defender, PUBLIC DEFENDER and others
Goldman et al v. Judd et al
as 8:2022cv00549
Plaintiff:
Adam Goldman, Joshua M. Shaw, Charles Johnson and others
Defendant:
Grady Judd, Howard L. Dimmig, II, Ita M. Neymotin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burns v. Cobb County, Georgia et al
as 1:2021cv04473
Plaintiff:
Derek J. Burns
Defendant:
Cobb County, Georgia, Lisa Wells, Lindsay Raynor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Global Tel Link Corporation v. Benson Githieya, et al
as 20-90030
Respondent:
DARLENE BYERS, NELLIE LOCKETT and BENSON GITHIEYA
Petitioner:
GLOBAL TEL LINK CORPORATION
Simmons et al v. Aramark Correctional Services et al
as 1:2019cv21013
Defendant:
Miami-Dade Commissary Unit, Global Tel-Link (GTL), Jackson Health Services and others
Plaintiff:
Hemer Croskey, Joseph Simmons and Jose Moreno
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armstrong v. Ivey et al
as 6:2017cv02008
Plaintiff:
Dewey U. Armstrong
Defendant:
Wayne Ivey, Global Tel Link and Armor Correctional Health Provider
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Valsaint v. Global Tel*Link Corporation
as 1:2017cv22282
Plaintiff:
Alveronick Valsaint
Defendant:
Global Tel*Link Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Phillips v. Global Tel Link
as 3:2016cv00734
Plaintiff:
James E Phillips, III
Defendant:
Global Tel Link
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Githieya v. Global Tel Link Corporation
as 1:2015cv00986
Plaintiff:
Benson Githieya
Defendant:
Global Tel Link Corporation
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Cooper v. Global Tel*Link Corporation
as 1:2015cv00593
Plaintiff:
Maryum Cooper
Defendant:
Global Tel*Link Corporation
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
