Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Go Daddy Operating Company LLC v. Unknown Party
as 2:2017cv04748
Plaintiff:
Go Daddy Operating Company LLC
Defendant:
Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02100
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Davis v. Cars 2 Go Incorporated et al
as 2:2016cv02083
Plaintiff:
Steven Davis
Defendant:
Cars 2 Go Incorporated and Dynasty Finance Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Mast v. Go 2 Transportation LLC, et al.
as 2:2016cv01022
Plaintiff:
Vernon Mast , Richard Hilton and Benjamin Selby
Defendant:
Go 2 Transportation LLC and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Van Go LLC v. Potts et al
as 2:2016cv00054
Defendant:
Deborah D Potts , Wayne A Potts, Sr. and Unknown Parties
Plaintiff:
Van Go LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Garcia v. Go Auto Sales LLC
as 2:2016cv00020
Plaintiff:
Christine Garcia
Defendant:
Go Auto Sales LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Jensen et al v. EXC Incorporated et al
as 3:2015cv08019
Defendant:
EXC Incorporated, Conlon Garage Incorporated, Go Ahead Vacations Incorporated and others
Plaintiff:
Jamien Rae Jensen , Chavis Johnson , Margaret Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
E-Scientific Incorporated v. Desert NewCo LLC et al
as 2:2014cv02596
Plaintiff:
E-Scientific Incorporated
Defendant:
Desert NewCo LLC , Go Daddy Operating Company LLC and GoDaddy.com LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv02079
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Jamali v. Maricopa, County of et al
as 2:2013cv00613
Plaintiff:
Imran Ahmad Jamali
Defendant:
Maricopa, County of , James Richmond , Richmond Consulting Group LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
