Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Post Foods, LLC v. OK Go Partnership et al
as 0:2023cv00110
Plaintiff:
Post Foods, LLC
Defendant:
OK Go Partnership, Damian J. Kulash, Jr., Timothy J. Nordwind and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Kappers Fabricating, Inc. v. E-go bike, LLC
as 0:2020cv00664
Plaintiff:
Kappers Fabricating, Inc.
Defendant:
E-go bike, LLC, d/b/a Ecotric/Seven Blacksmiths and E-go bike, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Fairbanks et al v. Go Fetsch Mechanical, LLC
as 0:2019cv02634
Plaintiff:
Jason Damman, The Sheet Metal Local #10 Control Board Trust Fund, John Quarnstrom and others
Defendant:
Go Fetsch Mechanicals, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1131
Babbs et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02130
Plaintiff:
Robert Dudley, David Knapp, John Titus and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
World Fuel Services, Inc. v. HamLake Discounts Enterprise Inc. et al
as 0:2016cv04123
Plaintiff:
World Fuel Services, Inc.
Defendant:
HamLake Discounts Enterprise Inc., Get N Go Inc. and Zulifquar Ali Punjani
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sherno v. Anoka County et al
as 0:2014cv00982
Defendant:
Anoka County , City of Apple Valley , City of Arlington and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Wallace Sherno
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bigham et al v. Go Fetsch Mechanical, LLC
as 0:2012cv02513
Plaintiff:
James Bigham , John Quarnstrom , Robert Vranicar and others
Defendant:
Go Fetsch Mechanical, LLC
Ideas to Go, Inc. v. Spigit, Inc.
as 0:2012cv01975
Plaintiff:
Ideas to Go, Inc.
Defendant:
Spigit, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Randall v. South Dakota, State of et al
as 0:2012cv00136
Plaintiff:
Carol A. Randall
Defendant:
South Dakota, State of, Federal Government, Ron Mills and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cush-N-Go, LLC et al v. Krampel
as 0:2011cv02494
Plaintiff:
Cush-N-Go, LLC , Michael Lattery and Brent Walton
Defendant:
Anthony Krampel, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
