Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01194
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Bocker et al v. Deer Consumer Products Incorporated et al
as AZ/2:15-cv-00046
Plaintiff:
Steven Bocker , Sadie LaBerge and Jay Wise
Defendant:
Deer Consumer Products Incorporated , Yuehua Xia , Zongshu Nie and others
Bocker et al v. Deer Consumer Products Incorporated et al
as 2:2015cv00046
Plaintiff:
Steven Bocker , Sadie LaBerge and Jay Wise
Defendant:
Deer Consumer Products Incorporated, Yuehua Xia, Zongshu Nie and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Campbell v. Yu
as 14-2511
Plaintiff / Appellant:
John C. Campbell, Derivatively on Behalf of New Energy Systems Group, Basil Malouf, Derivatively on Behalf of New Energy Systems Group and Baseem Malouf, Derivatively on Behalf of New Energy Systems Group
Defendant / Appellee:
Weihe Yu, Junfeng Chen, Shuxian Cui and others
Campbell v. Yu
as 14-2511
Plaintiff - Appellant:
John C. Campbell, Derivatively on Behalf of New Energy Systems Group, Basil Malouf, Derivatively on Behalf of New Energy Systems Group and Baseem Malouf, Derivatively on Behalf of New Energy Systems Group
Defendant - Appellee:
Weihe Yu, Junfeng Chen, Shuxian Cui and others
Antoine de Sejournet v. Goldman Kurland Mohidin LLP et al
as 2:2013cv01682
Defendant:
Goldman Kurland Mohidin LLP and Ahmed Mohidin
Plaintiff:
Antoine de Sejournet
Campbell et al v. Yu et al
as 7:2012cv03169
Plaintiff:
John C. Campbell , Basil Malouf and Baseem Malouf
Defendant:
Weihe Yu, Junfeng Chen, Nian Chen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Campbell et al v. Yu et al
as 1:2012cv03169
Plaintiff:
John C. Campbell, Basil Malouf and Baseem Malouf
Defendant:
Weihe Yu, Junfeng Chen, Nian Chen and others
Nominal Defendant:
New Energy Systems Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 ss Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
