Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Gomez v. Harrison County, Mississippi
as 1:2023cv00073
Plaintiff:
Brian Heath Gomez
Defendant:
Harrison County, Mississippi
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Warren et al v. State Automobile Mutual Insurance Company
as 3:2023cv00073
Plaintiff:
Patrick Warren, Baldomero Gomez and Fidel Gomez
Defendant:
State Automobile Mutual Insurance Company and State Auto Property and Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Gomez v. Harrison County, Mississippi et al
as 1:2022cv00279
Plaintiff:
Brian Heath Gomez
Defendant:
Harrison County Adult Detention Center, Harrison County, Mississippi, Unknown Welding and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gordon v. Cook et al
as 3:2021cv00538
Plaintiff:
Keith A. Gordon
Defendant:
Reba G. Cook, Fernando Gomez and The Hartford Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Alvarez v. Home Depot et al
as 2:2019cv00182
Defendant:
Home Depot and John and Jane Does 1-10
Plaintiff:
Jhony Gomez Alvarez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gomez-Umanzor v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00387
Plaintiff:
Yessenia Jackeline Gomez-Umanzor
Defendant:
BP America Production Company and BP Exploration & Production Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gomez v. USA
as 2:2019cv00102
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Juan Pablo Zamora Gomez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Gomez v. Nash
as 3:2018cv00237
Plaintiff:
Enrique Villa Gomez
Defendant:
Cheron Nash
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gomez v. USA
as 2:2016cv00015
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Juan Miguel Gomez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00074
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
