Cases 11 - 20 of 202
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00183
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 Electronic Fund Transfer Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Page (PS) v. Boggess et al
as 1:2023cv03431
Plaintiff:
Carl Anthony Page
Defendant:
Joshua Boggess, Waseline, Rabas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Houston (PS) v. Starr et al
as 1:2023cv03423
Plaintiff:
Eric Houston
Defendant:
M. Starr, Vido, A. Armijo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03386
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03382
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Flores Rosales et al v. Prestige Maintenance USA, Ltd.
as 1:2023cv02895
Plaintiff:
Vicente Flores Rosales, Yesenia Castillo and Rubith Gonzalez
Defendant:
Prestige Maintenance USA, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02714
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Meza (PS) v. Melvin et al
as 1:2023cv02695
Plaintiff:
David Meza
Defendant:
Amanda Melvin, Braden C. Piel, David A. Custer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruiz Alvarez et al v. Santa Ana et al
as 1:2023cv02571
Plaintiff:
Karina Ruiz Alvarez, Karla Gonzalez Velez, Gabriela Moctezuma Castillo and others
Defendant:
Adriana Santa Ana and Briana Santa Ana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Real Property
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
