Cases 31 - 40 of 42
Armstrong v. Baldwin
as 4:2008cv00424
Plaintiff:
Tony Dion James Beac Armstrong
Defendant:
John Baldwin, Terry Mapes, Mike Long and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gonzalez v. United States of America
as 4:2008cv00346
Petitioner:
Patricio Gonzalez
Respondent:
United States of America and United States of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Gonzalez v. United States of America
as 4:2008cv00248
Petitioner:
Pedro Gonzalez
Respondent:
United States of America and United States of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Gromotka v. Mukasey et al
as 4:2008cv00090
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Piotr Gromotka
Defendant:
Michael B. Mukasey, Michael Chertoff, Robert S. Mueller and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Gonzalez v. Ault
as 4:2008cv00055
Petitioner:
Gerardo Gonzalez
Respondent:
John Ault
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2007cv00563
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv00115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Gonzalez-Hurtado v. United States of America
as 5:2007cv04102
Petitioner:
Jaime Gonzalez-Hurtado
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2007cv00489
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Becker v. Hudson et al
as 5:2007cv04058
Petitioner:
Jan F Becker
Defendant:
Stewart Hudson, G W Bush, A Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
