Cases 1 - 10 of 211
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03555
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03252
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 - Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Tended Bar Inc. v. Cachoritos Trucking LLC et al
as 1:2024cv03217
Defendant:
Centerline Insurance, Cachoritos Trucking LLC and Juan Gabriel Ferrer Gonzalez
Plaintiff:
Tended Bar Inc.
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 14706 Carmack Amendment to the Interstate Commerce Act
Barris (PS) v. Starr et al
as 1:2024cv03057
Defendant:
John McGaugh, United States Department of Justice, Yangas and others
Plaintiff:
Gene L. Barris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez (PS) v. Flowers
as 1:2024cv03005
Petitioner:
Alfredo P. Gonzalez
Respondent:
Flowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Masters (PS) v. Criminals, The
as 1:2024cv01851
Respondent:
Gilbert M. Roman, Soto Cruz, Michael Gonzalez and others
Petitioner:
John Masters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown v. USA et al
as 1:2024cv01712
Defendant:
Ryan Gonzales, USA and Mint Officer Ryan Gonzalez
Plaintiff:
Nikki Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0051 - Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01526
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01277
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 - Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Gonzalez (PS) v. Pittman et al
as 1:2024cv01236
Plaintiff:
Alfredo P. Gonzalez
Defendant:
Pittman, White and Waters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
