Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Arredondo v. Johnson's Tree Service and Stump Grinding, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00029
Plaintiff:
Gonzalo Arredondo
Respondent:
Johnsons Tree Service And Stump Grinding Inc
Defendant:
David Johnson, Dayna Johnson and Johnson's Tree Service and Stump Grinding, Inc.
Torres Puello v. Guerrrero Mendez et al
as 5:2020cv00198
Defendant:
Roberto Cavada, Gonzalo Castillo Terrero, Josue Brito and others
Plaintiff:
Jorge Anibal Torrest Puello and Jorge Anibal Torres Puello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2019cv00872
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Torrealba v. Iris FC Restaurant, LLC et al
as 6:2018cv02149
Defendant:
Gonzalo Diaz, A.G.Y. Corporation, Iris FC Restaurant, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Maritza Torrealba
CARTER v. Reddish et al
as 3:2018cv01414
Defendant:
Sergeant Porr, Espino Gonzalo, Warden Reddish and others
Plaintiff:
GERALD J CARTER and Gerald James Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Deltora Enterprises Group Co. Ltd. et al v. United States of America
as 8:2018cv02713
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Deltora Enterprises Group Co. Ltd., Maria Isabel Carmona Bernasconi and Gonzalo Eduardo Monteverde Busselau
Melendez v. Jones et al
as 3:2018cv00167
Plaintiff:
William Hower Melendez, Sr.
Defendant:
Julie Jones, Dr. Gonzalo Espino, Warden Reddish and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Daniel et al
as 3:2015cv00618
Plaintiff:
Devandal Bernard Thomas
Defendant:
Williams E Daniel, Sarah E Grantham, Julian Aviles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Millan v. State Of Florida
as 8:2014cv00052
Plaintiff:
Gonzalo Millan
Defendant:
State Of Florida
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ward v. Espino
as 3:2013cv01388
Plaintiff:
Antonio L Ward
Defendant:
Gonzalo A. Espino
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
