Cases 1 - 10 of 30
MAURICE JOHNSON, ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF THERESA JOHNSON AND GREGORY GOODEN v. C. R. BARD, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv02783
Defendant:
BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC. and C. R. BARD, INC.
Plaintiff:
MAURICE JOHNSON, ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF THERESA JOHNSON AND GREGORY GOODEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GOODEN v. WALTON et al
as 2:2021cv00190
Defendant:
AARON WALTON, EPCOT CRENSHAW, THOMAS S. MULLER and others
Plaintiff:
WARREN E. GOODEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SCOTT v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2020cv00173
Plaintiff:
HARVEY SCOTT SCOTT and HARVEY SCOTT, JR.
Defendant:
SHAEFER, HAY, GERBER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Walker et al v. Digby et al
as 3:2020cv00762
Defendant:
Jen Digby, Howdy Shell, Jody Fognani and others
Plaintiff:
William Walker, Cameron Lovett, Dwayne Gooden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv05977
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Gooden-Reid v. Smith et al
as 1:2019cv01120
Respondent:
Barry Smith and PA State Attorney General
Petitioner:
Hasan Gooden-Reid
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GOODEN v. THE HARTFORD INSURNACE
as 2:2018cv01941
Plaintiff:
VICTOR GOODEN
Defendant:
THE HARTFORD INSURANCE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
GOODEN v. THOMPSON et al
as 2:2015cv02176
Plaintiff:
BEN GOODEN
Defendant:
BRIAN THOMPSON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GOODEN v. THOMPSON et al
as 2:2015cv00173
Petitioner:
BEN GOODEN
Respondent:
BRIAN THOMPSON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
DELOATCH et al v. GOODEN et al
as 2:2015cv00044
Plaintiff:
KAREN DELOATCH
Defendant:
EVELYN K. GOODEN and DAKOTA LAND TRANSP., INC.
Movant:
DAKOTALAND TRANSPORTATION, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
