Cases 31 - 40 of 463
EEON Foundation v. Google Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv01317
Respondent:
Alphabet Inc., YouTube, Inc. and Google Inc.
Petitioner:
EEON Foundation
Cause Of Action: 27 U.S.C. § 185
EEON Foundation v. Google Inc. et al
as 3:2020mc80046
Respondent:
Alphabet Inc., YouTube, Inc. and Google Inc.
Petitioner:
EEON Foundation
Ou-Young v. Haag et al
as 5:2020mc80010
Defendant:
Google Inc., Alex G. Tse, James A Scharf and others
Plaintiff:
Kuang-Bao P Ou-Young
Ou-Young v. Grewal et al
as 5:2020mc80003
Defendant:
Alex G. Tse, James A Scharf, Taiwan, Republic of China and others
Plaintiff:
Kuang-Bao P Ou-Young
John Demos, Jr. v. Google, Inc., et al
as 19-17541
Defendant / Appellee:
SUNOCO, APPLE, INC., AMERICAN TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH COMPANY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, Jr.
Paul Sayre v. Google, Inc.
as 19-17542
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL JOSEPH SAYRE, Owner of Rdevice
Defendant / Appellee:
GOOGLE, INC.
Inform Inc. v. Google LLC et al
as 1:2019cv05362
Defendant:
Alphabet Inc., Google Inc., John Does 1-100 and others
Plaintiff:
Inform Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Kuang-Bao Ou-Young v. Edward LEAVY, et al
as 19-17031
Defendant / Appellee:
RUTH BADER GINSBURG, U.S. Supreme Court Justice, and as an individual, SAMUEL CONTI, Former District Judge, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, and his estate, MARY M. SCHROEDER, and as an individual and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KUANG-BAO P. OU-YOUNG
APPLICATION OF USA FOR 2703(d) ORDER FOR USER INFORMATION OBTAINED BY GOOGLE, INC FOR INVESTIGATION OF VIOLATION OF 22 U.S.C. 2778
as 1:2019sc01868
In Re:
APPLICATION OF USA FOR 2703(d) ORDER FOR USER INFORMATION OBTAINED BY GOOGLE, INC FOR INVESTIGATION OF VIOLATION OF 22 U.S.C. 2778
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Ramsey Randall v. Township of Berks County, et al
as 19-2830
Defendant:
WEST READING POLICE DEPARTMENT, READING EAGLE NEWSPAPER CO, TOWNSHIP OF BERKS COUNTY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAMSEY RANDALL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
