Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Handlon v.Google, Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv00499
Plaintiff:
Quinton Paul Handlon
Defendant:
Google, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00243
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
McClain et al v. Pence et al
as 1:2022cv23738
Defendant:
Charles Terrance Canady, Michael Richard Pence doing business as U.S.A. Inc., Gary Gensler Agency Chairman doing business as US Securities Exchange Commission and others
Plaintiff:
Terence M. McClain, Linda N. McClain, Edward G. McClain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Google Inc. et al v. Surkes
as 1:2020cv24877
Plaintiff:
XXVI Holdings Inc., Google Inc. and Alphabet Inc.
Defendant:
Michael Surkes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Botha v. Sony Music Entertainment et al
as 8:2018cv01145
Defendant:
Apple, Inc., Microsoft, Inc., The Orchard Music Company and others
Plaintiff:
Seugne Botha
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Bugoni v. Castor et al
as 8:2015cv01194
Plaintiff:
Piero A. Bugoni
Defendant:
Jane Castor, Eric Ward, FNU Carithers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
E-Ventures Worldwide, LLC v. Google, Inc.
as 2:2014cv00646
Plaintiff:
E-Ventures Worldwide, LLC
Defendant:
Google, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Visual Real Estate, Inc. v. Google Inc.
as 3:2014cv00274
Plaintiff:
Visual Real Estate, Inc.
Defendant:
Google Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Rubbo v. Google, Inc.
as 0:2014cv60476
Plaintiff:
Joseph Rubbo, Pasquale Rubbo, Angela Rubbo and others
Defendant:
Google, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Dowbenko v. Google Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv23546
Plaintiff:
Uri Dowbenko
Defendant:
Google Inc. , Larry Page, Eric E Schmidt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
