Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Bloom et al v. Capital Financial Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00659
Plaintiff: Ene-Tea Bloom, Linda Brooks, Kevin Harden and others
Defendant: Capital Financial Services, Inc., Capital Financial Holdings, Inc., Gordon Douglas Dihle and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 09 Application for Confirmation of Arbitration Award
Bloom et al v. Capital Financial Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv04666
Defendant: Gordon Douglas Dihle, Capital Financial Holdings, Inc., Capital Financial Services, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Ene-Tea Bloom, Dorothy Crosbie, Jane Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lanzet v. Vical Incorporated et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv07528
Defendant: Richard M. Beleson, Gary A. Lyons, Robert C. Merton and others
Plaintiff: David M. Lanzet
Jin v. Vical Incorporated et al
as 1:2019cv07451
Defendant: Vijay B. Samant, Gary A. Lyons, R. Gordon Douglas and others
Plaintiff: Fuzi Jin
Sabatini v. Vical Incorporated et al
as 1:2019cv01457
Plaintiff: Eric Sabatini
Defendant: Vijay B. Samant, Gary A. Lyons, R. Gordon Douglas and others
Calice v. Vical Incorporated et al
as 3:2019cv01437
Defendant: Vijay B. Samant, R. Gordon Douglas, Vical Incorporated and others
Plaintiff: Michael Calice
Douglas v. Berryhill We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv05980
Plaintiff: David Claude Gordon Douglas
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00439
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gordon Tutton v. Brian Duffy
as 13-16914
Petitioner - Appellant: GORDON DOUGLAS TUTTON
Respondent - Appellee: BRIAN DUFFY, Warden of the California Medical Facility
Tutton v. Swarthout We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00863
Petitioner: Gordon Douglas Tutton
Respondent: Gary Swarthout
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?