Cases 1 - 10 of 622
Doe et al v. Daedone et al
as 1:2024cv04434
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe, Michal -, Kara - and others
Defendant:
Nicole Daedone, Rachel Cherwitz, Rachael Hemsi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01786
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Masri v. Liebowitz
as 24-1526
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH H. MASRI
Defendant:
Judge BARBARA O. AFRIYIE, Judge CHRISTINE P. KRAHULIK, ESTHER MASRI and others
Gottlieb et al v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service
as 6:2024cv00888
Plaintiff:
Allen Bruce Gottlieb and Phyllis Jean Gottlieb
Defendant:
Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 6532 IRS: Refund of Tax Penalty
GOTTLIEB et al v. MEEKER et al
as 1:2024cv01376
Plaintiff:
SEAN GOTTLIEB and LESEGO MANGWA
Defendant:
JACKIE MEEKER and RENE BITTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Warner v. Desouza et al
as 1:2024cv00442
Plaintiff:
Michael Warner
Defendant:
Francis A. Desouza, Sam A. Samad, Frances Arnold and others
Geswaldo et al v. Gottlieb, CPA et al
as 1:2024cv02543
Plaintiff:
Ms Rachel Geswaldo, Ms CHRISTINE GESWALDO, Rachel Geswaldo and others
Defendant:
MARK S GOTTLIEB, Mark S. Gottlieb, CPA and Mark S. Gottlieb, PC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fd Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Gottlieb et al v. Eisemann, Esq.
as 6:2024cv00623
Plaintiff:
Allen B. Gottlieb and Phyllis J. Gottlieb
Defendant:
Alexander Eisemann, Esq.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1470
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
S.E.C. v. Stewart
as 24-540
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant:
ALLEN B. GOTTLIEB, GEORGE WALLACE STEWART, PATRICK J. MADDEN and others
Appellant:
PHYLLIS GOTTLIEB
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
